A View of the C

Funny – Inappropriate – Edumacational

Time To Send Chuck Norris To Iran?

chuck_norris_catNot good news at all, maybe someone needs to send Chuck Norris over to handle this.

According to CNN: Iranian scientists have reached “nuclear weapons breakout capability,” according to a new report based on findings of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency.

A building housing the reactor at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in the Iranian port town of Bushehr. The Institute for Science and International Security report concludes Iran does not yet have a nuclear weapon but does have enough low-enriched uranium for a single nuclear weapon.

The type of uranium the International Atomic Energy Agency report says Iran has would have to be further enriched to make it weapons-grade.

February 20, 2009 - Posted by | Commentary, Did you know? | , ,


  1. Impeach Obama! He and the Democrats have caused this to happen!

    Comment by king | February 20, 2009

  2. That’s kind of funny, I don’t see the correlation – but I’m grateful for your comment.

    Comment by aviewofthec | February 20, 2009

  3. You know I have heard Iran has over 1000 Virtual Nukes. I read in an Israeli newspaper that an unknown person actually saw all the virtual bombs somewhere in Iran.

    Remember the Soviet Union? They decided to quit after watching a DeltaForce marathon on TV. Maybe we should send a copy of Delta Force Marathon for $24.99 from Costco to the Ayatollahs.

    Comment by Taghee | February 20, 2009

  4. I hope Iran can build its neuclear bomb very soon. If Israel has the right to produce 200+ neuclear bombs then Iran has the right to defend itself. Israel can wipe out the whole ME in minutes with its 200+ neuclear bombs and mighty military. Why we can’t say nothing about it?

    Comment by robin | February 20, 2009

  5. My comment was going to be along the lines of Robin’s. Already covered I see. Not sure if King’s comment was satire or not. I want to laugh and think it’s satire, but so many republinuts write things like that. I think that Norris is a much better decision to send into Iran than missiles. Civilian casualties, besides being unjust, will create a p.r. problem that Obama should avoid.
    At least Obama has mentioned, unlike Bush, that Iran has a right to nuclear development and self-protection. I also appreciated that Obama distinguished a separation of Ahmedenijad (sp?) and the religious leaders on one side and the civilian population on the other. I always hated when Bush would essentially say that all Iranians are evil.
    As long as the leader(s) of Iran preach that whole ‘death to Israel’ thing…That will always keep them (and others who espouse the same rhetoric) from true credibility and negotiation on the world stage, whether or not Israel was arbitrarily created following WW I, and regardless of the problems caused following its creation.
    Because we are hypocritical in our policies I have a problem with ‘laying down the hammer.’ If we are going to do something say it’s because of the ‘death to Israel’ thing and not because of ‘supposed’ nukes in Iran. If we are going to fight it should be for the right reasons.
    And lastly, if we are going to fight I would suggest using a large number of snipers and assassins rather than tanks and missiles. It’s all about the civilians. And also it would be nice to avoid placing a leader in power who was central to oil talks before he came into power. (Afghanistan and Karzai)

    Comment by Matt | February 20, 2009

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: